Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Tamai, Hiroshi; Mochiji, Toshiro; Senzaki, Masao*; Iwamoto, Tomonori*; Ishiguro, Yuzuru*; Kitade, Yuta; Sato, Heigo*; Suehiro, Rie*; Taniguchi, Tomihiro*; Fukasawa, Tetsuo*; et al.
Dai-41-Kai Nihon Kaku Busshitsu Kanri Gakkai Nenji Taikai Kaigi Rombunshu (Internet), 4 Pages, 2020/11
In light of recent delay of plutonium use in Japan and the increasing criticism of nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear security in the nuclear fuel cycle, the validity of these criticisms will be examined for the sustainable development of the nuclear fuel cycle policy. Issues on the view point of nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear security are examined.
*
JNC TN1400 2001-013, 70 Pages, 2001/08
JNC-TN1400-2001-013.pdf:5.13MB
no abstracts in English
Mochiji, Toshiro;
JNC TN1450 2000-001, 122 Pages, 2000/03
JNC-TN1450-2000-001.pdf:6.39MB
no abstracts in English
Mochiji, Toshiro;
JNC TN1200 2000-001, 13 Pages, 2000/03
JNC-TN1200-2000-001.pdf:2.94MB
no abstracts in English
*; Sato, Seiji*; *; Naruki, Kaoru
JNC TJ1400 2000-010, 71 Pages, 2000/03
JNC-TJ1400-2000-010.pdf:2.11MB
None
Shiba, Tsuyoshi*; Kamezaki, Hiroshi*; Yuyama, Tomonori*; *
JNC TJ9400 2000-012, 92 Pages, 2000/02
JNC-TJ9400-2000-012.pdf:3.18MB
This research aims to develop a system in which aspects necessary for FBR cycle and overall comparison of evaluation items (economy, safety etc.) are evaluated quantitatively and objectively as a part of Nuclear Cycle development's research project of the FBR cycle for practical use. There are various methods in the decision-making support. In this particular situation, features of each method were evaluated based on the analysis of cases with each method. Subsequently we constructed overall evaluation method by combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Multi-attribution Utility Function Method (MUF) and Cut-off Method. This method has variation in evaluation items, transparency in evaluation process and uncompensation. The six aspects of evaluation are economy, effectiveness of resource use, proliferation resistance, environmental effectiveness, safety, and research and development. The evaluation items and the evaluation index of each aspect were hierarchized and the evaluation structure was constructed. In the present study effect function for each evaluation index and pair comparison for examining significance of each item were utilized to select prospective systems for FBR cycle experimentally. The result confirmed reliability of our general assessment system as a decision-making support system for FBR system.
Suda, Kazunori; Kuno, Yusuke
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Suda, Kazunori; Kokaji, Lisa; Tazaki, Makiko; Tamai, Hiroshi; Kuno, Yusuke*
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Kokaji, Lisa; Tazaki, Makiko; Suda, Kazunori; Tamai, Hiroshi; Kuno, Yusuke*
no journal, ,
DOE orders for Termination of Safeguards and graded material attractiveness was evaluated. As a result, based on the disposition experience through down blending, graded material attractiveness and its policy would be referred for Japan's case for the termination of safeguards.
Suda, Kazunori; Kokaji, Lisa; Tazaki, Makiko; Tamai, Hiroshi; Kuno, Yusuke*
no journal, ,
To clarify nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear security measures for nuclear fuel cycle backend options including direct disposal of spent fuel, analysis of the nuclear material attractiveness categorization in the United States, difficulty in recovering plutonium from spent fuel and plutonium concentration and isotopic ratio in spent fuel were investigated.
Shiba, Tomooki; Tomikawa, Hirofumi; Hori, Masato
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Shiba, Tomooki
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English